Stupid cupid dating service
It seems that the world's more extreme sexual daters have found safety in the OKC numbers game and gathered in one place to pester each other. When you sign up to the site, as well as drafting the normal essay about how great you are and uploading four out of focus photographs from that period in 2006 when you were hot, you answer a raft of multiple choice questions.
Our negative correlation list is a fool’s lexicon: was also a successful word, but much less so (33%).
Thankfully, there is an option for “Neither, both are bad,” so maybe the query originated with someone who isn’t a sociopath.
Please, please, please tell me that this question wasn’t posed by someone who is seeking a partner that is okay with “Once a week or less” and who might be okay with someone who answered “A couple times a week.” I picture an army of hippies doused in patchouli, arm in arm and it makes me want to gag. I’m an editor, and if you can’t tell the difference between "there," "their" and "they’re," please do not apply. Who has been a) on a date with someone whose idea of dinner out was the plastic cans behind IHOP; or b) thinks that such a date is their idea of a good time?
Although the data shows this advice holds true for both sexes, it’s mostly directed at guys, because they are way more likely to talk about looks.
You might think that words like are nice things to say to someone, but no one wants to hear them.
Search for stupid cupid dating service:
I have to think that the person asking this question is looking for someone who answers “Yes, it would,” not “No, it wouldn’t.” And that, quite simply, is terrifying. Both options, I think most normal people would agree, are terrible.